A FAREWELL TO VIROLOGY

A farewell to virology by Dr. Mark Bailey

First part
SARS-CoV-2 not found
Dr. Siouxsie Wiles, virology's sidekick in isolation
The importance of isolation
What is virology?
The absence of virology controls means that this is not scientific research
Animal abuse and “antibody” studies
The virus quantity paradox

Second part
Fan Wu et al. Deus ex Machina
Turtles all the way
CDC claims about SARS-CoV-2
The revelations of Peng Zhou et al.
A new deception from Wuhan?
The start of a PCR pandemic by Professor Stephen Bustin

Third part
The “Little Mountain Dog” – Naivety or Gaslighting?
The “lab leak” distraction
Virology and the closed society
Metagenomic sequencing – Virology’s last gasp?
Why question the existence of a virus during a war?

Summary

Virology invented the virus model, but has never succeeded in meeting its own requirements. Viruses are claimed to cause disease after transmission between hosts such as humans, but scientific evidence for these claims is lacking. One of the greatest failures of virology has been the inability to obtain viral particles directly from the tissues of organisms said to have "viral" diseases. In order to obscure this state of affairs, virologists have resorted to creating their own pseudo-scientific methods to replace the long-standing scientific method, as well as changing the meaning of words in the dictionary in order to support their anti-scientific practices. For example, an “isolated” isolate does not require [for virologists] the physical existence of particles to obtain “isolate” status.

A virus particle must fulfill defined physical and biological properties, including being an intracellular parasite capable of replicating and causing disease in a host such as humans. However, “viruses” such as SARS-CoV-2 are nothing more than phantom constructs, existing only in imagination and computer simulations. In this paradigm, cases of invented diseases like COVID-19 are nothing more than the detection of genetic sequences and selected proteins believed to be “viral.” The existence of a virus is not necessary in this circular reasoning loop and therefore entire “pandemics” can be constructed based on digital creations and falsely supported by in vitro (“test tube”) molecular reactions. This essay has three parts.

The first part traces the history of virology and the inability of virologists to follow the scientific method. The numerous and broad claims of virologists can all be shown to be false for the following reasons: (a) the absence of direct evidence and (b) the invalidation of indirect "evidence" due to the uncontrolled nature of the experiments [c that is to say the absence of counter-experiments or control experiments]. The examples provided cover all major aspects of virological fraud, including so-called isolation, cytopathic effects, genomics, antibodies, and animal pathogenicity studies.

Part two examines the fraud used to spread the COVID-19 “pandemic.” An analysis of the methodology used by the original inventors, Fan Wu et al., shows how the fictional SARS-CoV-2 was “created” through anti-scientific methods and linguistic sleight of hand. This is part of an ongoing deception where viruses are pretended to exist by modeling them on previous "virus" models. If we take the example of SARS-CoV-2, the trail of “coronavirus” genomic models dating back to the 1980s reveals that it has never been demonstrated that any of these genetic sequences came from the inside a viral particle – phylogenetic trees are fantasies. The misapplication of polymerase chain reaction [PCR] has propagated this aspect of virological fraud and created the “cases” to maintain the illusion of a pandemic.

The third part analyzes the way in which certain key participants, “health” institutions and the mainstream media maintain the illusion of the virus through the control of information and narratives that repeat the claims of virology. By coincidence, virological fraud now finds itself at the heart of COVID-19 fraud. From there, however, it can be critically evaluated by people outside of virology and the pseudo-scientific paradigm that virology has built around itself can finally be dismantled and discarded. The aim of this essay is to refute the various claims that pathogenic viruses exist and cause disease. SARS-CoV-2 was used as the main example, but the principles apply to all so-called viruses. The following discusses the often obscure literature of virology on its own terms, which, it must be said, can make parts of this essay a little heavy to read. However, we hope that this contribution fills a gap for the reader seeking a more technical understanding of the virus hypothesis, as it seeks to expose the very basis of so-called pandemics and fraudulent medical practices. The threat posed by virology to humanity continues to grow. It is therefore time to say goodbye to these destructive pseudo-scientific practices and free ourselves from our unnecessary fears.